On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:55:58PM -0400, langdon wrote: > On 06/26/2017 01:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 06/26/2017 11:04 AM, Langdon White wrote: > > > > > We talked about this with the server wg and decided for F27 server we > > > would > > > try to avoid an "everything else" module and figure out how to solve this > > > problem more nicely between now and release. We have multiple options here > > > including : generating modules for everything, making an extra repo of > > > stuff available, leaving non-modules out, and, finally, the everything > > > else > > > module. > > So there is never going to be any mixing of modules and non modules? I > > would think another way to solve this issue might be to get dnf to > > prefer modules, but still operate on either rpms or modules, so if you > > ran 'dnf install tmux' it would look for a tmux module, if it finds it > > great, it uses that. If it doesn't then it looks for the rpm and uses that. > > Then if later you do 'dnf update' and there is now a tmux module it > > uninstalls the rpm and intalls the module, etc. > > Essentially, this ^^ is exactly the plan. The DNF folks will have to weigh > in on exactly how the priorities will work. I also would like to see some UX > testing around your last point. As in, I am not sure the user gets what they > expect if it replaces the tmux-rpm with the tmux-module without any hint.
What exactly would be the difference between tmux.rpm and tmux.module.rpm? Would it be configure flags? Bundled libraries? Something else? -- Tomasz Torcz Morality must always be based on practicality. xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl -- Baron Vladimir Harkonnen _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
