On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 16:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 22:38 +0000, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > os-autoinst adamwill 73 weeks ago
>
> Uh. What? I built this for fc26 in April. That's not 73 weeks ago. And
> 'dnf install os-autoinst' does not report any broken dependencies.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=878719
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2a2d78207d
Oh, I see the problem now, though it doesn't explain the '73 weeks
ago':
[os-autoinst]
os-autoinst-openvswitch-4.4-18.20170410git97928a2.fc26.armv7hl requires
openvswitch
[os-autoinst]
os-autoinst-openvswitch-4.4-18.20170410git97928a2.fc26.ppc64 requires
openvswitch
so the problem is that the current stable openvswitch was not built for
two arches; the openvswitch package currently in updates-testing *is*
built for those arches, however. It seems pointless to send out an
update that disables the subpackage for two arches for a few days until
openvswitch is pushed stable.
Perhaps the proliferation of arches in primary Koji might cause a
rethink of how this automatic retirement works? It wouldn't seem to be
a good idea to automatically retire this package (which is in fact
quite important, and under active maintenance) on this basis.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
