On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> For F-13 it may be a little late. So shall we make this an F-14 target? > I see new commit to the koji. Thanks for working on jack2, but the
No problem. Although I was the one collecting the pieces, it was rather a collective work. Thanks to everyone who is involved. We need to do some testing now, and clean up the glitches before F-14. > question is why the package name is jack-audio-connection-kit? As far > as I know the package name should be derived from the main tarball > name. > I thought about doing that once. Jack1's and jack2's source codes are distributed on the same website [1], We know that JACK stands for Jack-Audio-Connection-Kit. So there shouldn't be any confusion. Sadly, there is no unique agreement on the package name across distribution. As far as I know, we were the only distro distributing jack1 under the full name "jack-audio-connection-kit". There is also a very different project called jack [2], although we don't have it on Fedora. This adds more to the subtlety as Mandriva distributes this jack as just "jack". What do other maintainers think? Orcan [1] http://jackaudio.org/download [2] http://www.home.unix-ag.org/arne/jack/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
