On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> (Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git)
>
> I know Richard Fontana has expressed some interest in reducing the need
> for FPCA. Maybe this is an opportunity to move in that direction? I
> know Spot has said that "License In = License Out" is adequate for
> projects on Github; I think Spot's concern with spec files is that we
> don't give them an explicit license (right)?
>

I was under the impression that everything in Fedora was MIT licensed
unless otherwise specified as per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Licenses/LicenseAgreement

Is that incorrect?

-AdamM

> As we're moving things, can we do something in Pagure to cover this, so
> the FPCA isn't needed here?
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to