On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 10:22:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I hate the "self contained" vs "system wide" distinction, but since we > have it, shouldn't this be "system wide" change?
Yeah, because: > > == Scope == > > Proposal owners: > > - Update nodejs > > - Rebuild all binary modules, apply patches as necessary > > > > * Other developers: > > Other Node.js packagers' attention may be required if the update > > causes issues for their packages. Generally, self-contained changes should have all of the work being done by the owners, not asking work of other people. But, I guess it somewhat depends on how many other packagers are affected and how strong that "may be required" is. But, I think better than making this system-wide would be to have the Node SIG as a whole sign on to making sure all node packages in Fedora are updated; from the Changes policy, "Examples include addition of a group of leaf packages, or a coordinated effort within a SIG with limited impact outside the SIG's functional area." -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
