My opinion is that a branch called F-<n>/master is the nicest thing. Actually, all else being equal, I'd probably go for it being called f<n>/master, since gratuitous caps and punctuation in branch names is not a normal git convention. (But I only really care about the structure of the names, not the spelling.)
I don't really care whether you have an F-<n>/HEAD alias to that or not. I don't really care whether fedpkg provides front-end features to git that relieve one of knowing the actual branch name or not. Personally, I'd always look at the canonical git repository to see what the branches are called, and use those full names directly. Thanks, Roland -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
