On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 16:05 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> has any consideration been give to the size increase required by the
> change from libidn (678k) to libidn2 + libunistring (228k + 1246k)?
> That's not *too* bad, since currently none of the things which depend
> on idn end up in the initramfs, but still, it's noticeable.

Note also that these packages will increase in size as unicode standard
evolves. libidn due to IDNA2003 was tied to a specific old standard
while libunistring gets updated to the latest one thus includes much
more data than the previous ones.

I do not know whether the glibc switch from libidn to libidn2 would
provide some benefit in that aspect.

regards,
Nikos
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to