I'd agree with that. In addition so many peoples own scripts rely on them
that the user impact could be huge. That and every SA I know (and me)
dislikes the ip tool with a passion.

Regards,

Jon

On Wed, 17 May 2017, 08:47 Daniel P. Berrange, <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:29:42PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It was pointed out on IRC to me tonight that there are actually a
> > reasonable number of packages that still depend on net-tools[0].
> >
> > This has been deprecated for a long time now and we really should
> > strive to have everything use iproute2 instead so that there is no
> > longer a need to keep the deprecated package about, other than if
> > someone explicitly really wants netstat or ifconfig for some reason.
> >
> > Is the best way to handle this a mass bug filing?
>
> Converting apps from nettools to iproute is often non-trivial piece
> of work. As such isn't really something Fedora package maintainers
> should look to undertake as the risk of introducing regressions is
> non-negligible.  Bug reports really need to go the corresponding
> upstream communities to get anything done.
>
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com      -o-
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org         -o-
> https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-
> https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to