Przemek Klosowski wrote: >>> While this should probably be considered a bug that needs to be fixed, >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451463 > And Frank Ch. Eigler closed it, explaining that: >> It turns out that this is a deliberate decision. As >> outlined within the .spec file, the -devel subrpm is for building >> systemtap modules (running pass 1..4); the -client subrpm is for being >> able to build >> systemtap modules -remotely-. Both those tasks happen to be performed by >> the same binary. > One could create a sub-subpackage that both subpackages depend on, but > it's getting to be silly. Is there no other option to handle this in RPM?
other option is the status quo, where a common file is shared among > 1 subpkg (which is acceptable, not particularly a bug per-se). -- Rex _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
