OK so what kind of problem solves those changes? Can I have look on some bugzilla entry?
kloczek On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 at 21:47, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:25:32PM +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > Seems like splitting langpacks subpackages in all evolution packages few > > minutes ago just started. > > No generall agreement for such changes, ignoring already mentioned > > arguments. > > Seems only just because "we can". > > That's true. Within the existing guidelines and policies, we give our > packagers a lot of latitude for solving the problems in the packages > they maintain. If we decide we need a general policy for something, we > can do that, but we don't have to nor do we always want to. > > > Guys if you are bored just please undress, sit down next to your clothes > > and watch your cloths. This will be way more productive. > > Seriously, please. This is not constructive. > > > PS. Did anyone notice that Fedora in popularity ranking on > distrowatch.com > > dropped recently? > > That seems... decidedly unrelated. And, Distrowatch is a silly thing to > use as a metric for _anything_. As it says itself, the rankings > "correlate neither to usage nor to quality and should not be used to > measure the market share of distributions." > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mat...@fedoraproject.org> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Tomasz Kłoczko | Tel: 0774 1209067 | LinkedIn: *http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH <http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH>*
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
