On 30 March 2017 at 20:01, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> You don't know whether the person you are replying to > is "guessing" or whether they actually have experience and expertise > which just happens to be different from yours. In fact, in this case, I > will guarantee you that it's absolutely true. > Just one more note based on pure logic. If someone has experience bases on maintaining some set of typical small/trivial changes across thousands packages build/install/test frameworks like I have, but this person has different post factum experience/conclusion than mine. Because Fedora has no policies (as as far as I know never had) about not using /bin/bash in case when script is pure SH script or not using in preamble /bin/sh when script is bash script, has no policy about not using /usr/bin/env when it is only one possible to use interpreter, has no policy about correcting linking with not need libraries, has no at least few (maybe 3 or 4) similar such trivial to introduce (and IMO maintain) policies *significantly reducing numbers of some issues related to many dependencies between packages* .. .. conclusion must be that such person possessed this experience not working on Fedora (and/or close derivs like RH, Oracle Linux or CentOS). Am I right? Really I'm not asking about name or career details such person. Jut please use as The Final Argument name of the OS/distribution on which such changes have been introduced, maintained for some period of time and/or abandoned as creating to many long term problems. kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
