Dne 25.3.2017 v 07:14 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:45:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >>> Of course, EPEL vs Fedora comes to mind here, but I wonder: if the EPEL >>> maintainer has also commit on the Fedora branches, is it really that much >>> of a big deal? And vice-versa? >> Well, I don't want to get the EPEL bugs assigned to me. > And you would not get them so, everything is fine \ó/ >
So the POC as it it now would be preserved? Or there would be POC for Fedora and POC for EPEL? Currently I typically confirms just ACLs for Rawhide, but after branching, the Rawhide maintainer becomes maintainer of the latest stable branch as well. I think this nicely corresponds with gained experiences of the package maintainer and it might help a bit to keep stable branches stable. OTOH, with PR, I think that the number of co-maintainers might drop. Nevertheless, except the notifications and bug assignments, I don't mind much if there are ACL per branch or not. Vít _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
