On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:51:21 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> >>> These are required NOT to be noarched.
> >> This is a Python-package from pypi, not a header only lib… I don't see
> >> any reason for forcing the built binary packages to be archful… There is
> >> no configuration or anything going on in setup.py; it even drops all
> >> flies in %pythonX_sitelib.
> > The C++ headers in that package are not covered by the test suite?
>
> The headers are tested, but we don't need to generate arch'ed
> binary-pkgs to run the testsuite on all arches; running the build
> archful and the built 'binary'-pkgs noach'ed should be sufficient in
> this case.
Not sure yet how exactly that would work, because it would require a
noarch subpkg to be defined with a different %{name} than the src.rpm
package. Questionable practice. Technically it would work though,
provided that the build system still compares all noarch builds with
eachother in order to detect differences.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
