On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:56:44 +0100
Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de> wrote:

> On 02/21/2017 01:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +0000
> > "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <zn...@znmeb.net> wrote:
> > ...snip...
> >
> >>
> >> Rawhide as it currently exists can't stay solid enough for me even
> >> with just the few pieces I absolutely need. Tumbleweed, for all
> >> it's promise of "latest and greatest", is not supported by enough
> >> third parties to be useful even as just a host. And sid is, well,
> >> sid.
> >
> > I'm curious what issues you hit with Rawhide? Have any examples?
> 
> Current rawhide (== Feb 15) does not match with what the builders
> use. => It's impossible to locally investigate runtime bugs
> 
> Real world example:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425129

adding --enablerepo=local to mock call will create the same buildroot
rawhide builds have in koji


                Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to