On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:48:33PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > Polymake blocks system updates by strict Perl dependence: > > polymake-3.0r2-1.fc25.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.24.0 > > and the new perl package is tagged 4:5.24.1 > > This blocks upgrades for dependent packages (perl*, git*, vim*), while > polymake can't just be bypassed because it is a dependency of quite a > bit of other packages (python*, gap*, sage*, ocaml*), so it's a stalemate. > > I reported that in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415548 > > Now, the reason I mention it here is that I noticed a number of update > hiccups recently, resulting from strict checks by DNF. I don't think it's > DNF's fault: here, it just enforces a strict requirement specified by > 'polymake'. I reported other cases, where the file specifications cause > conflicts between the old and new version of the package: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404897 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396848 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396319 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396849 > > and people commented that they also are all packaging errors. Still, > they do block upgrades. > > My question is: is reporting them individually the best approach? I am > happy to keep doing it, but there's been more than the usual amount > recently, and I am wondering if there's some automation that should be > done to detect that in packaging.
You mean something like debian's piuparts? Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
