On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 12:06:40 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Monday, January 2, 2017 3:47:52 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Monday, January 2, 2017 2:40:34 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > Also, the question is whether it isn't really glibc bug, because > > > schedulers non-ppc64le architectures look to be more "fair" regardless > > > the default. > > > > Sorry, not really -- at least i686 (build cross-compiled from x86_64 > > probably) is also affected: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17147577
It is nice to see that the build finished in the end (even though it took ~2 days). So not really infinite ... ... but what worries me is that both builds, even this one, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17147897 finished almost at the same time; both tests took about 48 hours? Is there some timeout, signal, or scheduler attempt to change something after 48 hours? :) Pavel > FTR, I just filed: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410052 > Who knows, maybe that could move this forward. > > That's a result of gnulib discussion: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2017-01/msg00009.html > > Pavel > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
