On Thursday, 08 December 2016 at 19:26, Dennis Gilmore wrote: [...] > I would like to see us stop pushing non security updates to updates from > updates-testing entirely and do it in monthly batches instead. we would push > daily security fixes and updates-testing. However this would make atomic > host > 2 week releases much less useful, as there would be no updates except for > once > a month.
You gave just one disadvantage of this proposal and no advantages at all. Why do you think the above is a good idea? I, for one, do not like waiting a month to get bug fixes that are not security-related. We are not RHEL or Microsoft or Adobe. I'm convinced that having bug fixes available as soon as they're ready is valuable (even if you choose to wait before installing them). Also, as was pointed out elsewhere in this subthread, updates get tested only after they're released to stable very often, so it's also valuable to get the feedback earlier rather than in a month. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
