On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 20:46 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:41:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > And? What*s the problem? It's part of a packagers job to balance the > > tradeoffs and find a viable compromise. > > You don't need to agree. In the reply you've truncated, I've only pointed > out how I feel about the updates flood. It's my number one reason why I've > pretty much given up spending karma points in bodhi as all too often an > update had been pushed before I could vote -1. Rushing out updates > defeats the purpose of Test Updates, IMO. And nothing is done to make > the updates-testing repo more sexy.
There are much simpler ways to deal with this, if it's really a problem. The fact that updates default to auto-push after +3 karma is entirely plucked out of the air, it's just something someone made up one day. We could *certainly* change that. I'd be quite interested in a tweak where there's a minimum-time-in-testing value for autopush too, which would default to say 2 days. The way that would work is automatic push would never happen until the update had actually been in updates- testing (not queued for push) for that long. *Manual* push could still be done during that time, and the update submitter could make the minimum-time-in-testing value larger or smaller (as they can make the karma threshold for autopush greater or smaller). 2 days would just be the default (and is similarly a number I've just made up; we could make it something else). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
