On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 23:02 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 12/06/2016 09:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Well, assuming you're including ldb and tdb in 'samba', no, I don't > > think we know that yet. > > libldb and libtdb use waf, the Samba build system, and are closely > related to Samba. > > > > If it were just Samba, fixing Samba would be the right course of action. > > > > Assuming they're all sharing some kind of bad check in their waf > > scripts and we can fix that and they'll all build properly again, I > > guess, sure, we could do that and see whether anything else breaks. > > libldb and libtdb seem to contain many configure tests from samba, which > needs the attached patch. > > But we need to revert this (both aspects, implicit int and implicit > function declarations). It's pretty much hopeless; the breakage is not > restricted to Samba. We can keep the C/C++ flag separation in > redhat-rpm-config.
OK. I've gone ahead and done this. I will rebuild libldb and libtdb when redhat-rpm-config is built and in the buildroot. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
