No as long as the storage is modified before the first start of the
docker daemon and the first execution of docker-storage-setup, it should
be fine.


On 11/17/2016 07:54 PM, Subhendu Ghosh wrote:
>
> Assuming cloud-init can also select the storage or is that too late in
> the process?
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2016 15:58, "Vivek Goyal" <vgo...@redhat.com
> <mailto:vgo...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:19:06PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>     > On 11/16/2016 03:09 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>     > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:01:06PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>     > >> On 11/16/2016 02:56 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>     > >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:49:25PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher
>     wrote:
>     > >>>> On 11/16/2016 02:40 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>     > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:32:46PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh
>     wrote:
>     > >>>>>> We would like to change the docker container storage to
>     default to
>     > >>>>>> Overlayfs2 in Fedora 26.  But we have a problem on Atomic
>     Host and
>     > >>>>>> Fedora Server distributions.
>     > >>>>>>
>     > >>>>>>
>     > >>>>>> Currently docker-storage-setup defaults to devicemapper
>     and is hard
>     > >>>>>> coded to setup a thinpool of 40% of remaining disk. 
>     Otherwise it sets
>     > >>>>>> up loopback devices on the root file system. 
>      Devicemapper is nice
>     > >>>>>> since it works with thinpools and can automatically
>     expand the storage
>     > >>>>>> if the disk space is getting used up.
>     > >>>>>>
>     > >>>>>> Moving to Overlay, we can more easily use the root file
>     system directly,
>     > >>>>>> which would be fine for Fedora Workstation.  We want to
>     preserve the use
>     > >>>>>> of the remaining storage for Overlay on AH and Fedora
>     Server,  since
>     > >>>>>> this would give a user flexibility to switch back to
>     using devicemapper
>     > >>>>>> if they had problems with the Overlay driver.
>     > >>>>>
>     > >>>>> And being able to do so basically involves following.
>     > >>>>>
>     > >>>>> - docker-storage-setup creates a logical volume from free
>     space
>     > >>>>> - Creates a filesystem on that logical volume
>     > >>>>> - Mounts that logical volume on the directory which docker
>     is going to
>     > >>>>>   use.
>     > >>>>>
>     > >>>>>   mount /dev/docker-vg/foo /var/lib/docker/
>     > >>>>>
>     > >>>>> - Now when docker users overlay2 graph driver, all the
>     images, containers
>     > >>>>>   and associated metadata will be stored outside the root
>     filesystem and
>     > >>>>>   onto /dev/docker-vg/foo logical volume.
>     > >>>>>
>     > >>>>>> We can not as easily
>     > >>>>>> support the expanding disk for Overlay since we will not
>     use using thinpool.
>     > >>>>>
>     > >>>>>>
>     > >>>>>> We have looked at options to hard code OverlayFS with the
>     defaults,
>     > >>>>>
>     > >>>>> If we always mount /var/lib/docker on on /dev/vg/foo for
>     overlay2 driver
>     > >>>>> this will be a regression w.r.t current behavior. So I
>     would not
>     > >>>>> recommend changing current behavior. I think this should
>     be an opt-in.
>     > >>>>> We are working on provide a config knob to elect this
>     behavior and
>     > >>>>> atomic host and fedora server will have to opt-in somehow.
>     > >>>>>
>     > >>>>> I think it will be easy for atomic host as they already
>     drop something
>     > >>>>> in /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage-setup. Not sure how
>     fedora server
>     > >>>>> variant will do it.
>     > >>>>>
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>> Today, Fedora Server relies on whatever is the default for
>     docker-storage-setup.
>     > >>>> We just tell Anaconda to reserve up to 15GiB by default for
>     the / partition and
>     > >>>> then it puts all remaining free space (on drives selected
>     to be used by
>     > >>>> Anaconda) into a single logical volume with no partitions.
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>> It's a very easy thing for us to drop a different config
>     file for
>     > >>>> docker-storage-setup into place for Server. So if that's
>     all we need to do, let
>     > >>>> me know and I'll work it up.
>     > >>>
>     > >>> Ok, that sounds good. We are working on providing a knob to
>     opt-in new
>     > >>> behavior. I think all you have to drop in config file will
>     be something
>     > >>> like.
>     > >>>
>     > >>> /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage-setup
>     > >>>
>     > >>> STORAGE_DRIVER=overlay2
>     > >>> YET_TO_BE_NAMED_OPTION=VAL
>     > >>>
>     > >>> So upstream default will continue to be devicemapper. We
>     will have to
>     > >>> modify fedora workstation, fedora server and atomic host
>     infrastructure
>     > >>> to opt-in for overlay2.
>     > >>>
>     > >>
>     > >> Why exactly does this need to be opt-in? Why wouldn't we just
>     change the default
>     > >> on Fedora Server to use overlay2 instead of devicemapper?
>     > >>
>     > >> I think I'm missing some key part of the problem here.
>     > >
>     > > I mean it will be devicemapper in upstream project. And
>     distributions will
>     > > have to opt-in for overlay2.
>     > >
>     > > And I think one reason being that rhel uses same git tree and
>     we don't
>     > > want to switch to overlay2 by default for rhel yet.
>     > >
>     > > overlay2 will be an experiment on fedora first as default and
>     if it works
>     > > well, then change default upstream too.
>     >
>     > OK, when you said "opt-in", I was assuming you meant that from
>     the user's
>     > perspective (as in having the user make an explicit choice).
>     What you meant was
>     > that Server would carry a different default from the upstream
>     project. That's
>     > easy enough to accomplish (we can do the same for Atomic as well).
>     >
>     > The packaging guidelines for this are here:
>     >
>     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Per-Product_Configuration
>     <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Per-Product_Configuration>
>     >
>     > Of course, that's only necessary if we want Server (and Atomic)
>     to differ from
>     > Workstation and/or non-productized Fedora. If they're all going
>     to switch to
>     > overlay2, then it's just a trivial matter.
>
>     I think all are going to switch to overlay2 by default. But there will
>     be on difference. Fedora workstation will like to have its overaly2
>     setup on top of rootfs. While Fedora Server and Atomic Host will like
>     to carve out extra logical volume from free space and setup overlay2
>     on top of that.
>
>     So there will be total of two config options. One will be same in all
>     3 variants. While second one will be used only by server and atomic
>     host variants.
>
>     /me goes to read per product configuraiton link now.
>
>     Vivek
>     _______________________________________________
>     devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>     To unsubscribe send an email to
>     devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to