I think N+2 updates are barely done pre release by users out there, so issues will rarely be noted before final (F25 final in this case) lands. N+1 updates happen quite often during N+1 alpha and beta phase, thus they'll probably see more testing and should be recommended. OpenQA is fine, but it doesn't handle a comprehensive set of installations to catch all the user-specific changes to installed packages or configuration files.
If somebody wants a regular N+2 update cycle to have at most one update per year, he/she probably shouldn't (and wouldn't) use Fedora but some more conservative distro such as Debian. So: 1) N+1 should be recommended 2) N+2 should not be discouraged _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
