On 10 November 2016 at 12:11, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 09:58 -0700, stan wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:21:13 -0500 >> Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > So in any case, what I am suggesting is that we make a semi-unique >> > identifier. It is unique enough that you won't get a collision in some >> > 'target' space, but not so unique that it stands out like a black dot >> > on a white shirt. Make the code adjustable somewhere in the process so >> > that if someone wants it off, it can be done and if they need it to be >> > a bigger space it can be done so. >> >> Isn't this pretty trivial to create? We put a limit on the number of >> machines that are accessible on a local network, say 10 million. Then >> we start at >> Fedora-1.localhost. >> e.g. >> 'Fedora-' + str (counter) + '.localhost' >> >> So if there is only one computer on the local network it is named >> Fedora-1.localhost. >> >> If there is more than one computer on the local network, we check for >> collisions with names until we hit the next in numerical order that >> isn't taken. >> >> while name_taken, >> counter += 1 >> hostname = 'Fedora-' + str (counter) + '.localhost' >> name_taken = check_for_collision (hostname) >> >> This ensures there will be *lots* of collisions on the web, but zero >> locally, at least for the first few hosts. >> >> Or am I missing something? > > How exactly are you planning to check for collisions with hosts that > are shut down or somewhere else (laptops)?
Or even how are you going to communicate that there is another machine of that name? That is a registration and command and control issue in a completely different 'stack' than the installer usually is in. -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
