On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:48:29PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > This is accurate. > > > > the files must be identical if they are not elf binaries. > > I think the .py[co] files embed timestamps or something like that. > So they are nonidentical but not actually different at all.
The embedded timestamps are of the *.py files from which the .py[co] are generated. So if the .py files have the same timestamps in both then the *.py[co] will have the same checksum. But there could be something in the build process that's changing the timestamps of the .py files.... > You want all python to be in things that you don't want two of, AFAICT. > > In general one could split out a -headers subpackage with the headers and > the python. But the rawhide libstdc++-devel actually has nothing but the > headers anyway (with libstdc++-static split out), so just the python there > would make you only ever want libstdc++-devel.x86_64 and you can compile > with -m32 just with matching-version libstdc++.i686 installed. > If the headers and python truly aren't different between the x86 and x86_64 build, then you could mark the rawhide libstdc++-devel package as noarch. -Toshio
pgpun9cXJOsWg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
