On Thursday, October 27, 2016 12:53:27 PM CEST Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi all, > > I am thinking, why we don't have enabled Bodhi for Rawhide? I know that > you might think now that I went nut and it is bureaucracy,
Not at all to me. > but let me > explain. > > If I understand it correctly, during several past years, our build > process was more streamlined and we are trying to do the Rawhide > composes in a similar fashion we are doing stable releases. But for some > reason, we are still not using Bodhi for Rawhide and I see no reasons > not to use it. Here are some benefits if we were using Bodhi: > > * One of the nice things which Bodhi does is running several check, such > as depcheck, rpmlint (actually question if we are using rpmlint for > Fedora builds was what triggered this email), etc. On one hand, I'd love > to see these checks running in Koji, but there is no support for them > and I don't even see the support coming. So enabling Bodhi for Rawhide > would give us this opportunity. +1. I've been looking at abidiff output for F25 today, and I came to exactly the same conclusion: That's useful especially in Rawhide. > It is actually quite interesting, that while most of the development > happens in Rawhide, there is less sanity checks then for the Rawhide, so > if you screw up something in Rawhide, it will get into stable version > and you might not notice until you submit some stable update. > > * From time to time, there is necessary to build some framework, which > consist of several components which must be released together. > Currently, we either temporarily break Rawhide or we are asking for side > tag. But why not use koji for that? Users of stable releases are not > affected by incomplete builds, since the don't reach even the > update-testing without pushing via Bodhi. If we are able to submit this as one "gigantic" update, then bodhi is fine, otherwise: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/663 > * And probably last think, why the Rawhide should be really exception? > Why we should not use Bodhi if we are using it anywhere else? The reason for exception might be that bodhi == a bit slower workflow during big rebuilds, but with side-tags that's not an issue IMO. > Lets use Bodhi for Rawhide, where the submitted update would immediately > go into Rawhide, unless maintainer wishes some testing period. > > Any comments on this topic? Question: is Rawhide "rolling" distro? Or is this bodhi/QA step needed to make it working "rolling" distro? Pavel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
