On 15 October 2016 at 18:39, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: [..]
> * If you have specific ideas for improvements, do file bugs and attach > your patches or explain what you think would help. I'm sure he would > love to hear it. > 1) Package base texlive binaries with base set of necessary packages (alphabetically) afm2pl, bbox, cefutils, detex, dvilj, dvips, dviutils, latex, latex-bibtex, luatex, makeindex, metapost, omega, pdftex, tex4ht. Maybe few more or less (maybe it would be good to package all dvi related stuff as single package). Each of those package should be with some descent/usually used set of additional stuff even if those bits are maintained as separated texlive package 2) Package something like texlive-devel which will contain whatever is needed to build other packages (part of it could be set of rpm macros generating provides/requires dependencies if it is possible) 3) Package *only* what is really need or requested by at last one person 4) do not package PDFs but text dumps of those documentation. Mark those doc as %doc and include in proper packages. Read at least one time those dosc because texlive contains many completely random and sometimes wrongly placed documentation. Do not package documentation about how to build/install those extensions/packages. These are 4 very simple points containing as well basic rules of packaging texlive stuff. In other words texlive should be similar to areas with php/pecl, perl, python and few other. kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko LinkedIn: *http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH <http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH>*
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
