On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gb...@bzb.us> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> > > wrote: > > > > > That may be, but all the articles I read suggested "be afraid, be very > > afraid". > > In addition, https://goo.gl/V2IyFq > > basically just comes out and says, not to use it. > > That's stale and overstated but I'm fine with dire warnings because > otherwise people use experimental stuff and flip out when it face > plants. What's needed are people who can tediously gather an autopsy > report so it can be made better. And that's pretty much what's > happening. > > Well that link is from their wiki. Then of course there is this thread which kind of steps through it all: https://goo.gl/rIyJ0R One of my favorite quotes: "Wow. So it sees the data strip corruption, uses good parity on disk to fix it, writes the fix to disk, recomputes parity for some reason but does it wrongly, and then overwrites good parity with bad parity? That's fucked." > About the Fedora default, this recently came up on desktop@ so I'll > just refer to that: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@ > lists.fedoraproject.org/message/T6FNLLPJ7LICKSVTTPS4KSIDHOKUUPNC/ Yeah, and there was also this thread: https://goo.gl/wWHLVA Like I said, I believe that ship has pretty much sailed...
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
