On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 10:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > What exactly would you have had me do? Just sit on this and pretend > > there was no bug and when we saw more and more people come into #fedora > > and complain about it, tell them the risk was minimal so they should > > just suck it up and get on with their lives? I mean, seriously, what do > > you suggest? > > > Tell people the actual workaround? > > rpm -Uvh --nodeps --nopostun \ > > http://$MIRROR/updates/testing/25/x86_64/s/systemd-udev-231-8.fc25.x86_64.rpm > > --nopostun will disable the broken scriptlet. > --nodeps will avoid the hard EVR requirement on the rest of systemd. > Then a normal dnf update should fix your deps.
Huh - that's handy, and I did not actually know --nopostun (something new every day, etc.). It does involve including instructions on how to find the package, though, which would inevitably go stale as it moves from u-t to stable. Still, thanks. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
