On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 6:12:55 PM CEST Björn Persson wrote: > Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 09/21/2016 11:32 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:16:39 PM CEST > > > build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > >> vim-syntastic has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > > >> On aarch64: > > >> vim-syntastic-lisp-3.7.0-6.fc26.noarch requires clisp > > >> On aarch64: > > >> vim-syntastic-cs-3.7.0-6.fc26.noarch requires mono-core > > >> On aarch64: > > >> vim-syntastic-d-3.7.0-6.fc26.noarch requires ldc > > >> On armhfp: > > >> vim-syntastic-d-3.7.0-6.fc26.noarch requires ldc > > >> Please resolve this as soon as possible. > > > > > > What's should packager do in such case? Recap: noarch package depends on > > > arch-dependant package, which is not available everywhere. > > > > That's what the ExclusiveArch directive in RPM is for. > > I have found that when using ExclusiveArch in a noarch package you need > to include "noarch" in addition to the architectures where the > dependencies are available. Otherwise the build won't work.
Well, thanks for this point. I thought that ExclusiveArch basically means switching to non-noarch. Anyways, black/white-listing architectures sounds like a hack to me. It is very likely I'll never recognize the deps are available on blacklisted architectures (so I'll likely never revert this black/white-list). Pavel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
