On Fri, 09 Sep 2016 17:54:07 -0700
Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 10:44 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings. 
> > 
> > Fedora Infrastructure currently maintains two sites for general open
> > source code hosting: fedorahosted.org and pagure.io. 
> > 
> > Fedorahosted.org was established in late 2007 using Trac for issues
> > and wiki pages, Fedora Account System groups for access control and
> > source uploads, and offering a variety of Source Control Management
> > tools (git, svn, hg, bzr). With the rise of new workflows and source
> > repositories fedorahosted.org has ceased to grow, adding just one
> > new project this year and a handful the year before.   
> 
> I'm replying here as I'm not subscribed to users@.
> 
> Pagure is fine for code projects, but we (still) use the fedora-qa
> trac instance for tracking non-code-related activity, like arranging
> Test Days. Is Pagure the recommended replacement for this kind of
> purpose also? It doesn't feel right. If not, what is? Thanks!

Yes it is. At least I am planning on moving the trac's that I control
that do this sort of thing to pagure. 

There's been a lot of improvement to pagure's issues of late and lots
of discussion of more. I think it meets the simple needs right now. 
More complex workflows are under discussion still, so if you need them,
you might want to wait and/or join the discussion.

I'm likely to move infrastructure over very soon and perhaps a bunch
more of the smaller ones. 

kevin

Attachment: pgpPvi_ZWrybT.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to