On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 04:46:50PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:34:03 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I wanted to push (attached) to the filesystem package in dist-git,
> > but a couple of things:
> >
> > (1) "riscv64" isn't technically speaking an RPM architecture. I have
> > posted patches to RPM upstream, and I think that "riscv64" is the
> > right name.
> >
> > (2) What is the purpose of the massive list of 64 bit architectures
> > there anyway? Wouldn't it be more sensible to use %{__isa_bits}
> > instead, as in:
>
> wouldn't work for ia64, 64-bit, but using /usr/lib, IIRC
We never officialy supported ia64 and it's dead now.
--
Tomasz Torcz 72->| 80->|
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl 72->| 80->|
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
