On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:30:30 +0200
Thomas Moschny <thomas.mosc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2016-07-18 23:57 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com>:
> > I could tell you more about your specific updates if you list
> > them...  
> 
> This one took a bit more than 6 days from submission to testing:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e5b5fbfa86

Yep. This is one of the other cases where something happened. :) 

So, when we first started doing atomic updates in bodhi composes we ran
into some problems with f22-updates-testing. Some were server (selinux,
etc), some were bodhi, some were rpm-ostree. In debugging and trying to
fix that we added a side repo with a newer rpm-ostree. This allowed us
to interate quickly without having to officially build and submit
rpm-ostree updates. We got everything composing and moved on. 

Last week however we were adding the f24-updates and
f24-updates-testing atomic updates and when doing so noticed we still
had the old side repo enabled for f22-updates-testing. This was
removed/disabled. However, things broke again there (only in
f22-updates-testing, which your update above was in). Making things
more difficult, many releng folks were on vacation that week (I was).

Finally we got it fixed up by unpushing a rpm-ostree update that was
sitting in f22-updates-testing for a year, re-enabling the side repo
and doing a compose, then disabling it again.

This took some of my saturday morning (to see what was going on), then
discussion in the releng meeting monday morning to come up with a plan
to fix things up, then the actual fix monday. 

kevin

Attachment: pgpqZqqa_J1e5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to