On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Till Maas <opensou...@till.name> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 08:32:42PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > > > Sorry, I didn't notice it mentioned in the wikis that I read about > renaming > > that they shouldn't be retired from stable branches. It would probably be > > helpful if that sort of information there. Or even better, if fedpkg > > prevented or at least warned about this sort of thing. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life > > fedpkg could probably check this nowadays, since we track whether > retiring is allowed in package DB. Would you mind filing a RFE for this? > Improving the wiki documentation is also a good suggestion - could you > add your suggestions to the pages? I will then check whether it is > technically correct. > Created an issue: https://pagure.io/fedpkg/issue/24 For the wiki, I would recommend that the GIT section be changed to read something like this: Run fedpkg retire DESCRIPTION in all non-stable Fedora branches and EPEL branches, if applicable. The retiring needs to start with the oldest branch (e.g. retire on f22 before you retire on master)
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
