On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:38:03 -0400 Tom Lane <t...@redhat.com> wrote: > I see that libtiff.fc13 and libpng.fc13 are now showing "critical path > approved", for which I thank those who did the work.
Thanks. ;) > I remain a bit > unclear about a couple of things: > > 1. Bodhi is showing both packages as requested push-to-stable. Which > *I* certainly didn't do, and considering they are only at +2 karma, > this means that the threshold for auto-push is actually lower than it > was before, not higher. WTF? Is the idea here to remove every last > vestige of the maintainer's judgment from the process? No. Please stop assuming everything in a negative light. ;) This looks like a bug to me... if you didn't request stable, it shouldn't go yet. I can talk to Luke about it, perhaps you could file a bodhi bug on it? > 2. libtiff.fc12 and libpng.fc12 are still lonely with zero karma. Is > the restrictive policy in force for F-12 too? I'm even less willing > to believe that we have enough testing manpower to cover both back > branches right away. Yes, it does appear to be there as well. I am just ramping up my f12 test machine now... but yeah, it's not clear that we intended this to go live for f12 too. ;( kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
