On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Denise Dumas <ddu...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Sounds like a job for rhscl :-)
>
> Maybe?
>
> Having nodejs in an SCL (or eventually module) would certainly help
> with versioning issues going forward.  However, given Fedora has

Versioning maybe but not the "we're going to be shipping a major
version of nodejs that will be EOL half way through the F-24 cycle"
problem. Whether it's SCL format or standard package format it would
still be built against F-24 deps and we'd still have the issue here.
Sure there could be 4.x and 6.x along side each other but we'd still
have a EOL potentially vuln release hanging around.

Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to