On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I'd instinctively prefer (1) from a "do one thing and do it well" > perspective; (2) starts down the road of a better/more complex form of > service-monitoring/management and ends up doing it really badly in messy > sh script in N places.
Absolutely. The core OS doesn't need to come with a half-assed reimplementation of Nagios. "service foo status" should be just "is the pid running, and that's how things will be with Systemd as I understand it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
