On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 08:54 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 08:36 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > I think the goal is, of course, to reduce the noise out and focus on > > making sure the packagers know about the truly broken. :) > > > > Another useful goal might be to only emit errors/warnings for which we > can accompany the message with a link to the section in the packaging > guidelines that explains how to avoid the problem.
sure. I think there are a number of things which are "wrong" but not obviously a specific rule. For example: Your package seems to have grown by 1.5GB. or Hmm - you had 300 provides in the last package, this one has 25000. that seems _wrong_ but not clearly against any rule. :) -sv. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
