On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:29:37PM +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > On 15 May 2010 21:07, Till Maas wrote:
> > The upstream release monitoring tool (formerly fever) is not really used > > to identify such packages, because there is no process to identify > > non-uptodate packages like there is a process to identify old FTBS-bugs. > > > > Yes, and I think it is time to draft a proposal for same. Remember > Seth also had a script (which he ran quite recently to figure our > concerned packages). A current problem I see with using upstream release monitoring is that there is no easy way to query which bugs are ignored, because it is perfectly valid to not touch the bug as a maintainer but only update the package. This will avoid a new bug to be filed, but the maintainer will still be notified with a new comment. Regards Till
pgpAR889EpURY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
