On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 00:01 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > In some cases, the people to represent are even our users, e.g. they asked > for "adventurous" updates, so why does the Board decide on a "vision" for > conservative updates? Are people that set on their personal preference that > they can't see that our users want something different?
Please stop banding about the forum poll as if it were some sort of scientific measure with meaningful results one could use as a basis for decision making. It was none of that. All it gave us was info we already had. Some users would like more adventurous stuff, while some users would not. We already had that information, the poll told us nothing new. You also seem to keep thinking that just because a decision was made that a person or some people disagree with, that their input was "ignored". That is not the case. Data can be reviewed and used as part of a decision process, even if that decision ultimately does not agree with you. You are using inflammatory words to try and stir up the pot because boy, it sure does feel good to be angry about something! And boy, it sure does feel good to get other people to feel angry too, even if they have no idea what they're angry about, or whom they are angry at. So quit with the dramatics already. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
