On 04/29/2010 09:24 AM, Adam Miller wrote: > By that logic we shouldn't have a development group at all since developers > know what they need.
I sense a misunderstanding. Yes, IMO, any "default" (preselection) of "a devel group of packages" hardly makes sense. However, marking packages as members of an optional "devel group of packages" surely makes sense. Or differently: One person's most valuable devel-tool is another person's packaging bloat ;) Ralf > -AdamM (from Android ) > > On Apr 29, 2010 2:07 AM, "Ralf Corsepius"<rc040...@freenet.de> wrote: > > On 04/28/2010 09:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >>> Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.un... > Make both optional. > > Devs should know what they need, so there should not be any need to make > any of them default. > > Ralf > > > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
