On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Thomas Janssen <thom...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tom Lane <t...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> writes: >>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:03:28 -0400, >>> Tom Lane <t...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> Wouldn't it be sensible to approach the Mozilla folk about getting them >>>> to relax their requirements so that sane packaging is possible? ISTM >>>> that this must be a problem for other distros too. >> >>> I though we did that several years ago. I wasn't a packager at that time, >>> so I didn't follow what was happening closely. >> >> Well, if we say to them "either you fix this licensing problem or your >> trademarks will disappear from Fedora", it might get their attention. >> Especially if we can get Debian and some other distros to tell them the >> same. > > Well, since Debian already has Iceweasel, Mozilla obviously don't care. > > IMO, we should go the Debian way.
Whoops, sorry for the PM Bruno and Kevin, i did just click on reply to all. Forgot to check for a cc. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
