----- "Adam Williamson" <awill...@redhat.com> wrote: > There actually already *is* a review point > prior to moving to -updates, but it's currently owned by rel-eng and > is > not highly publicized, and very little gets rejected. It is there, > though: rel-eng explained this earlier in the threads, and explained > that they are unhappy with it being informal. I'm trying to find the > post, but there's just too much to wade through, sorry :(
"Why Fedora needs an Updates Policy" from Josh Boyer: http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/36737.html That's why we need some defined process. That's why we need to improve current practice. That's why all those proposals appear. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
