On 03/05/2010 02:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > One size does still not fit all, although this is a great idea for > most packages in Fedora for packages in certain niches this is a bad idea. > > I've said this before (and got 0 response), I believe there should > be some divide made between core packages (with core being quite big, not > the bare essentials, but also most of all desktop environments, etc.) and > non core packages.
Well, the reason I didn't respond before is because I thought I had no
disagreement with what you wrote. It seems obvious to me that even if
we made a policy that Fedora was primarily stable once released, that
there would always be exceptions to that rule and things that should be
updated more aggressively. So I would not advocate for any policy that
was absolute and inflexible. There should be room for human judgment to
play a role.
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
