On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 00:05 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: >> The issue right now appears to be the same as when we have a critical >> security or bugfix that has to be fast-tracked and we have LOTS of pkgs >> in updates-testing. > > I don't know if this will help. Once a release has gotten a number of > updates, mashing that release will take a long time, regardless of how > many new updates are going in. This is particularly bad of say > 11-updates or 12-updates, but -testing generally goes much faster as > there are less things in there (if bodhi obsoletes are doing the right > thing). > At the risk of complicating the world would it make any sense for us to have (in increasing order of importance) updates-testing updates updates-important packages that are security or critical go from updates-testing to updates-important - and that happens as necessary all other updates go from updates-testing to updates once a month. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
