On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Doug Ledford wrote:
>> Fixes my problem
>> Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
>> problem supposedly fixed by this update just noting that their system
>> still works ok with the update)
>> Doesn't fix my problem (but doesn't necessarily imply it's any worse
>> than before)
>> Causes new problems
>
> Yes, this makes more sense than just +1 and -1.
>
>> (which should, IMO, be an automatic veto of any push to stable, requiring
>> intervention to override)
>
> But no, please no! While it should definitely prevent an automatic push if
> the maintainer enabled that, it should not keep the maintainer from pushing
> anyway.
Well the way I read it, "manually pushing anyway" is the "requiring
intervention" part.
- Panu -
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
