On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:28:11AM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > I am sorry, but I do not see a real need for special guideline for the > fipscheck checksums. The policy where these checksums should/will be > placed should be decided by the fipscheck package itself. Of course I
As soon as multiple packages are affected, there should be a guideline to document how something needs to be done to work, e.g. if someone wants to package a new software that contains fips checksums. Regards Till
pgpH0W92gI7Fd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
