On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:43:35PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> Note that rpm < 4.6.0 did behave differently here: packages with
>> conflicting files were allowed to be installed in the same transaction but
>> not if installed separately, leading to strange situations. So if there's
>> a chance you've tested on RHEL/Centos at some point, that could explain it
>> as it'd then be just a matter of which order the packages got installed
>> in.
>
> That could well explain why we've only seen this reported on EPEL 5.
> I thought it was a coincidence, but looks like it could be the older
> RPM version there.
Okay, if it has only been seen on EPEL then no need to look further. IIRC
it got fixed in RHEL 5 too, 5.3 or thereabouts.
- Panu -
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
