On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 03:06:24PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote: > Well, the standard IIRC does want them to be separate, though again it's > important to realize that this check isn't meant to protect against an > attack, but rather to check against erroneous corruption of the binary. It > seems unlikely that such corruption would change the checksum to match the > errors ;) > > > The separate /lib directory tree seems the way to go, to me. That way > > the checksum files could be named the same as what they check, no magic > > needed.
teach fipscheck to ask rpmlib ? rpm -V. We already have this method. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
