On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 12:25 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > If we do that check before the alpha release that should let us track > down > awol maintainers and unmaintained pkgs pretty easily, I think. > > thoughts?
There's trivial packages which simply don't really need touching. I just updated congruity for the first time in a couple of months. it got a (very trivial) upstream release; upstream could easily have held off and I'd have had absolutely no reason to touch it. it's a simple package that just does what it's supposed to do, it doesn't need much TLC. I wouldn't want to be considered 'unresponsive' just because it hadn't needed touching for an arbitrary period. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
