On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 22:29 +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > 2010/1/14 David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com>: > > Anyone got any better ideas? Thoughts about which of the above is > > preferrable? > > I am not sure it qualifies as "better" than your suggestions... but > the problem of different executables with the same name providing > equivalent functionality via a different implementation is pretty much > what the alternatives system is designed to deal with...
Thanks. As I understand it, the alternatives system is a host-wide configuration setting: only one set of things can be at use at a time on a host; that seems too blunt for this, alas - I think people should be able to use a mixture of programs written with both stacks. Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
