On 20/01/2025 10:32, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 at 11:27, Usama Arif <usamaarif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
> ...
>> Hi Ard,
>>
>> Just wanted to check how should we proceed forward? Should we try and fix
>> the warning
>> and corruption during kexec as done in this series or not initialize memory
>> attributes
>> table at all in kexec boot? I would prefer fixing the issues as in this
>> series.
>>
>
> I would prefer kexec boot on x86 to disregard the memory attributes
> table entirely.
Would you like Dave to send something like
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CALu+AoS8tb=hgaybdw5og4a1qboxhvuidpu0ynmz-ne1nbq...@mail.gmail.com/
on the mailing list (wrapped in ifdef CONFIG_X86_64)
or we could do
https://lore.kernel.org/all/fd63613c-fd26-42de-b5ed-cc734f72e...@gmail.com/
as well.
Or if there is any other way you prefer, I am happy to implement and test.
Thanks,
Usama
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#121054): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/121054
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/110517813/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
